AI Lab · by Minji Kim · 2026-10-15
I ran the same 20 coding tasks through Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Gemini 4 Argon — here's what actually broke
0 sparks · 10 comments
AI Lab · by Minji Kim · 2026-10-15
0 sparks · 10 comments
Can Arslan · 0 likes
this matches my experience, opus models tend to be more cautious which is great until you just want it to shut up and write the function
Noah Miller · 0 likes
did you control for prompt wording across the three? thats usually where these comparisons fall apart, small wording changes shift results alot
Mehdi Benali · 0 likes
concurrency bugs being nailed by argon is interesting, i wouldve put money on opus for that honestly
Sleepy Coder · 0 likes
yeah that surprised me too, might just be luck on one sample tho, i wanna see this at n=100 before i trust it
Ananya Rao · 0 likes
we do this exact thing at work quarterly, rotate models through a fixed eval set. genuinely the only way to cut through marketing
Tola Ibrahim · 0 likes
importing a path that doesnt exist is such a classic LLM move lol, happens to me weekly no matter the model
Noé Petit · 0 likes
can you share the actual task list? would love to replicate this with the models we have access to internally
Sleepy Mango · 0 likes
this is the kind of post this sub needs more of honestly, less hype more data
Ren Suzuki · 0 likes
20 tasks is a good start but careful drawing big conclusions from such a small n, variance is real at this scale
Rohan Mehta · 0 likes
lol i did somthing similar and my main finding was that all three models are equally bad at admitting when they dont know something